PDA

View Full Version : Help Craps Master Get Better at PLO


Craps Master
04-10-2009, 01:15 PM
Here are a few hands from some recent PLO sessions I had online. I'm not very good at PLO at all, quite bad in fact, but there were some fish around who are so awful that even an unlearned rookie like me can still get a big edge. So, here are some hands:

Hand 1:

(6 max) - $25/$50 - $2,000 Cap Pot Limit Omaha Hi
Seat 1: UTG ($1,735)
Seat 2: HJ ($1,750)
Seat 3: CO ($5,485)
Seat 4: BU ($8,370)
Seat 5: Villain ($26,190)
Seat 6: Craps Master ($9,629)
Villain posts the small blind of $25
Craps Master posts the big blind of $50
The button is in seat #4
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Craps Master [2d 6d Jc 7c]
UTG folds
HJ adds $4,000
HJ folds
CO folds
BU raises to $100
Villain calls $75
Craps Master calls $50
*** FLOP *** [9d 7h Kd]
Villain checks
Craps Master checks
BU checks
*** TURN *** [9d 7h Kd] [Ad]
Villain checks
Craps Master bets $300
BU folds
Villain has 15 seconds left to act
Villain calls $300
*** RIVER *** [9d 7h Kd Ad] [Ah]
Villain has 15 seconds left to act
Villain has requested TIME
Villain checks
Craps Master checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Craps Master shows [2d 6d Jc 7c] a flush, Ace high
Villain shows [Td 5d 2s Tc] a flush, Ace high
Villain wins the pot ($897) with a flush, Ace high
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $900 | Rake $3
Board: [9d 7h Kd Ad Ah]
Seat 1: UTG didn't bet (folded)
Seat 2: HJ didn't bet (folded)
Seat 3: CO didn't bet (folded)
Seat 4: BU (button) folded on the Turn
Seat 5: Villain (small blind) showed [Td 5d 2s Tc] and won ($897) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 6: Craps Master (big blind) showed [2d 6d Jc 7c] and lost with a flush, Ace high

Note that in the cap games, the betting is capped at 40BBs or, in this case, $2,000. The marks in the hand are the Villain and the HJ. BU is new to the table but seems to play a questionable brand of poker as well, and I believe is generally a limit razz and O8 player, not a PLO player. Villain is a notorious calling station in both NLHE and PLO before the flop and on the flop, but often gives up on the turn or river. If he ever starts making pot bets or big raises, he almost always has something strong. So, anyway, I have questions about my play.

Preflop: I am under the impression that this is a standard call, seeing as how I'm double-suited and getting a great price.

Flop: Even though I've caught a draw, it's a terrible draw, so I see no reason to put money into the pot. It doesn't seem like a great spot to semi-bluff OOP against the PFR.

Turn: I've hit a flush, albeit a terrible one. I elected to bet it, but in hindsight, I have to wonder if this is even worth betting. What besides a better flush is ever going to call me here? Maybe a set would, but almost never two pair. Or should I just bet in hopes of taking it down and be happy with the pot? Would delaying a bet until the river be better?

River: I'm unenthusiastic about my hand after getting called on the turn, but Villain sometimes makes stupid calls. The river pairs the A, making the threat of a full house quite possible. Villain thinks a long time then finally checks. Is this a mandatory bluff spot, or does my hand have enough showdown value to just check behind? Also, if I were to make a pot sized bet here on the river, is the range I'm representing credible enough to actually get folds from anything weaker than a full house?

Hand 2:

This hand is not one of my proudest moments:

(deep 6) - $25/$50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi
Seat 1: Villain ($24,672)
Seat 2: BB ($6,647.50)
Seat 3: UTG ($8,538)
Seat 4: HJ ($5,863)
Seat 5: CO ($23,462)
Seat 6: Craps Master ($6,481.50)
Villain posts the small blind of $25
BB posts the big blind of $50
The button is in seat #6
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Craps Master [Kc 4s Kd Ac]
UTG has 15 seconds left to act
UTG folds
HJ folds
CO has 15 seconds left to act
CO folds
Craps Master raises to $175
Villain calls $150
BB has 15 seconds left to act
BB calls $125
*** FLOP *** [2c 5c Jd]
Villain bets $525
BB folds
Craps Master raises to $2,100
Villain raises to $3,675
Craps Master has 15 seconds left to act
Craps Master calls $1,575
*** TURN *** [2c 5c Jd] [8d]
Villain bets $7,875
Craps Master adds $2,368.50
Craps Master folds
Uncalled bet of $7,875 returned to Villain
Villain mucks
Villain wins the pot ($7,872)
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $7,875 | Rake $3
Board: [2c 5c Jd 8d]
Seat 1: Villain (small blind) collected ($7,872), mucked
Seat 2: BB (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 3: UTG didn't bet (folded)
Seat 4: HJ didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: CO didn't bet (folded)
Seat 6: Craps Master (button) folded on the Turn

The marks in this hand are the HJ (the villain from hand 1) and the SB, the villain in this hand. Both are characterized by playing loose and passively preflop, which isn't the sin in omaha that it is in hold'em, but they take it too far, routinely playing marginal hands OOP. That said, they play their big hands fast on later streets, but are still passive with marginal/speculative hands. The reason I'm not proud of this hand is that it represents one of the hazards of playing a lot of tables. In this session, I was switching in and out on a lot of table, playing both PLO and NLHE, and playing about 9 tables. I was so busy trying to track down these PLO marks that I didn't notice that this game was deep and not cap. My raise on the flop is precisely because I thought it was a cap game.

Preflop: Standard open OTB.

Flop: Here's where everything gets ugly. I am thinking that this is a cap game and that I'm going to just ship it on the flop with my overpair and NFD and be done with it but, to my surprise, the villain comes back with a reraise, at which point I realize what's going on. So now I'm a little flustered. I think about it and wonder just WTF the villain would come back at me with a mini-reraise with. I can't imagine it's a draw, so I have to figure I'm behind a set, which sets him up perfectly to bomb out on the turn on a safe card or force me all-in with the worst of it now. While there are certainly some retarded 2-pair hands in his range, because he's mega-loose preflop, would they play like this?

I conclude that I am probably up against a set, and probably top set at that. His min-reraise is designed to get me to continue on with worse hands. But, as it happens, I am getting 4.3:1 on my money, and I have 9 outs to the nuts and 2 outs to the nut flush on a paired board. Thus, folding is not an option, given that I would almost certainly get paid off if a K hits, and will often get paid off if a club hits. If the flush hits with one of the two cards that pairs the board and he moves in, I guess I can let it go. If he checks, I can check behind and see what happens on the river, or I could move in, hoping he isn't trapping me. Not entirely sure what I'd do there.

So, the question then is whether to just go ahead and move in here, just in case he's bluffing, or just call and use my position on the turn. I elected to call and then fold when I missed. If this were a hold'em type situation and I had the NFD, I'd obviously be getting all-in, but it's PLO, and so I wonder what people with PLO experience think is the better line.

Obviously, the best line would probably have been to just call the flop, which is what I would have done if I had realized I wasn't at a cap table. I'm not getting great odds to chase against made sets when calling a PSB, but I will be able to get paid handsomely on my two K outs, and I may even milk him for enough to justify drawing with my flush outs. What's more, if he slows down on the turn, I can either take the free card or try to push him out of the pot. I can also rep aces if an ace hits, or a straight if the board brings a running straight. Having the option of making a big raise on the turn or river and knocking him out of the pot definitely adds to the value of catching a card to improve.

I have a few more hands to post, but I'll just start with those. And, just to remind everyone, I realize I'm fucking terrible at PLO, but I'm never the worst player at the table in these games, not even close.

WarDekar
04-10-2009, 03:57 PM
River: I'm unenthusiastic about my hand after getting called on the turn, but Villain sometimes makes stupid calls. The river pairs the A, making the threat of a full house quite possible. Villain thinks a long time then finally checks. Is this a mandatory bluff spot, or does my hand have enough showdown value to just check behind? Also, if I were to make a pot sized bet here on the river, is the range I'm representing credible enough to actually get folds from anything weaker than a full house?

You say he likes to call once then give up given more action when he's not strong, and bets when he's strong. Given this logic and the fact he just called your bet on the turn then didn't bet the river, I think you're up against a better (albeit not nut for sure) flush far more often than a worse flush or non-boated two pairs (which are now all but worthless anyway).

As such I think you pretty much HAVE to bluff this (assuming you think he'll fold a medium flush-given your description of Villain I'm assuming he would) if you're taking the line you took to get to that point.

WarDekar
04-10-2009, 04:01 PM
2nd hand- Call flop obviously (not raise the first time).

After the mistake you have to just call his re-raise and continue as outlined I think, sucks but oh well mistakes happen once its made you have to make the best of it.

WarDekar
04-10-2009, 04:03 PM
I'm an idiot and mis-read the HH...

Why don't you look into getting a replayer if you want to have hands posted here? Makes things WAY easier

Craps Master
04-10-2009, 08:23 PM
I'm an idiot and mis-read the HH...

Why don't you look into getting a replayer if you want to have hands posted here? Makes things WAY easier

Eh, I'll just use a standard hand converter.

LiveproFTW
04-10-2009, 09:57 PM
first, this is probably obvious, but pot-sized bets are rarely the most optimal.

In the first hand, pf is w/e. Do u call w/ a6o in NLHE? My guess is they're similar. Your hand has good equity, but could be troublesome postflop. Im not folding though w sb being a fish.

flop, c/c is fine v BTN who habitually cbets. Rep straights on the turn, c/c most turned twopairs, c/c flush.

Turn, you should bet for value/balance. Fish w two pair or a set do not fold to one bet in my experience. They prolly shouldnt either cuz it's not a bad spot to bluff for you. As such, you don't need to be potting here. A bet of $200 gives you a good price on your bluffs when you have nothing, while charging all their crappy FH draws and occasional pair+straight draws for when you do have a hand.

Riv, given your description of villain, Im prolly betting $800ish as a bluff. As for it being mandatory? Not at all. You'll get looked up by people who read hands decently well since you're not potting the turn w/ top two/sets.

Hand 2:

Wow, that's really bad, bro. Go with fewer tables! Even with 130bb or w/e, raising the flop means getting it in. Once he makes it 3675, just jam. On the flop you're only 40/60 against JJxx. Also, consider that you're a fav to a hand like 3c 4c 5s 6s or top two w a flush draw.

As for the turn, you're like 28% against jjxx. Folding is a mistake even if he shows you top set (unless I miscalculated the potsize. use a converter :)). It looks like there 7875 and you have to call 2631. 3:1, no?

Craps Master
04-10-2009, 10:20 PM
Wow, that's really bad, bro. Go with fewer tables! Even with 130bb or w/e, raising the flop means getting it in. Once he makes it 3675, just jam. On the flop you're only 40/60 against JJxx. Also, consider that you're a fav to a hand like 3c 4c 5s 6s or top two w a flush draw.

As for the turn, you're like 28% against jjxx. Folding is a mistake even if he shows you top set (unless I miscalculated the potsize. use a converter :)). It looks like there 7875 and you have to call 2631. 3:1, no?

I don't know where you're getting your equity figures, but I think they're way off. I'm 32% to win against JJxx on the flop and 19% to win on the turn.

LiveproFTW
04-11-2009, 12:20 AM
I don't know where you're getting your equity figures, but I think they're way off. I'm 32% to win against JJxx on the flop and 19% to win on the turn.

Are you looking at the equities versus his actual hand? The numbers I'm using are for all JJ combos.

http://www.propokertools.com/simulator/simulate.jsp?g=oh&b=2c5cJd&h1=Kc4sKdAc&h2=jj**&h3=&h4=&h5=

http://www.propokertools.com/simulator/simulate.jsp?g=oh&b=2c+5c+Jd+8d&h1=Kc+4s+Kd+Ac&h2=jj**&h3=&h4=&h5=

Craps Master
04-11-2009, 12:58 AM
Are you looking at the equities versus his actual hand? The numbers I'm using are for all JJ combos.

Yeah, I see now. I entered the board wrong. I think I agree shipping the flop would be fine, given that I raised.

LiveproFTW
04-11-2009, 01:22 AM
Yeah, I see now. I entered the board wrong. I think I agree shipping the flop would be fine, given that I raised.

Def. You are essentially flipping v his range I think. But, as you're alluding to, given that he leads strong, you are better off calling. You'll probably win 2 large bets when you turn a 3 or K. You'll also tend to find out something about his actual hand on the turn cuz a lot of weak players lead top and bottom or bottom two, but do not bet the turn with them.

Craps Master
04-11-2009, 03:51 PM
Full Tilt Pot-Limit Omaha CAP, $50.00 BB (5 handed)

SB ($6809)
BB ($27420.50)
Craps Master (UTG) ($8096)
MP ($2393)
Button ($7120)

Preflop: Craps Master is UTG with 4c, Kc, Ah, 7h
Craps Master calls $50, 1 fold, Button bets $200, SB calls $175, BB calls $150, Craps Master calls $150

Flop: ($800) 2h, 3c, Kh (4 players)
SB checks, BB checks, Craps Master checks, Button checks

Turn: ($800) 8c (4 players)
SB bets $800, 1 fold, Craps Master calls $800, 1 fold

River: ($2400) 3h (2 players)
SB bets $1000, Craps Master calls $1000

Total pot: $4400 | Rake: $3

(Note that this is a cap game, so $2000 is the max I can get in, hence the call on the river)

Preflop: I have an extensive background in online NLHE. The idea of open-limping is something I'm still getting used to, but apparently it's all the rage in PLO. I should also point out that I realize this is a very marginal hand to be limping in with UTG in a 5-handed situation. It has the virtue of two high cards and is double suited. Other than that, it's pretty shitty. I'm willing to accept that just folding here is probably better, but it's not something I know 100% to be the case when the BB and button are huge donks (and possibly the SB as well). After the raise from one donk, the call by a questionable player, and the call by yet another donk, I felt like taking a flop was the best play for a mere $150 more.

Flop: In a situation like this in NLHE, my instinct is to check to the raiser and then move all in over his cbet. After I checked this hand, I immediately realized that cbets are not so automatic in PLO, so getting all in here with my NFD, TPTK, BD2NFD, and gutterball is not going to happen very often when I check. Most of the time, the OR is just going to check behind... as he did. Is it standard to go ahead and just bet out here in PLO? Full pot? Half pot? My inclination now is to go ahead and throw out a PSB here and move in over any raise.

Turn/River: Standard. On the turn I have a ton of outs. Granted, the club draw and gutter draw are not to the nuts, but I have to figure they'll most often win the pot if they get there on the river.

LiveproFTW
04-11-2009, 07:19 PM
If the players behind you are not aggro/skilled, playing this seems fine; esp. in a cap game where bad players will frequently get it in on the flop with worse draws. However, because we want players to get it in with their bad draws, raising seems superior; they won't want to fold their pair+straightdraws or even bare flush draws w/ 1.5x stacks.

In an earlier post I said potting is not always optimal. This flop is a situation, however, where it doesnt matter. You are never bet/folding as either a protection bet or as a bluff. Checking is not really an option because you lose so much of your equity when it checks thru (and it frequently does). So, I agree that pot/get-it-in is the way to go.

As played, turn/riv well played.