PDA

View Full Version : One other thing with Props to look at


HinesWard86
01-28-2009, 10:36 AM
I have noticed that some books have Cards/Steelers QB's listed for the completions and yardage props and others have Warner/Roethlisberger listed.

Pay attention to the Roethlisberger one especially. Earlier today Roethlisberger under 17.5 completions was +115 at one book and Pitt QB's over 17.5 completions was -115 at another book. All you need is for Big Ben to land on 17 and a trick play where Ward or someone else throws the ball and you can win both.

Prop Man
01-28-2009, 11:36 AM
That'll be a tricky one if a RB or WR throws the ball. I can see a book grading it against the player and ruling a RB is not cinsidered a QB...or saying anyone that throws the ball counts (depending on which side the player played).

The Chaperone
01-28-2009, 02:16 PM
FWIW, I don't think anyone but Ben and Warner will be throwing a pass, but obviously you can't argue with a free roll.

PerpetualCzech
01-28-2009, 02:45 PM
There's a much simpler way to sweep these bets: Ben gets injured before he hits 18 completions.

HinesWard86
01-30-2009, 09:54 PM
There's a much simpler way to sweep these bets: Ben gets injured before he hits 18 completions.

Right, or hopefully gets pulled.

Same thing was available with Edge James rushing yards today. Over 42.5 yards at +140 at one book, under 43.5 yards at -140 at another book.

FWIW I would lay -150 that a pass will be attempted by another player besides Warner or Big Ben.

Prop Man
01-30-2009, 10:43 PM
FWIW I would lay -150 that a pass will be attempted by another player besides Warner or Big Ben.

The prop: O/U 2.5 different players to attempt a pass can be found at +150 or better at many places I think.

HinesWard86
01-30-2009, 10:55 PM
The prop: O/U 2.5 different players to attempt a pass can be found at +150 or better at many places I think.

I thought that prop was to complete a pass

Prop Man
01-31-2009, 06:23 AM
hmmm, I'm not sure, you may be right. apologies if I was in error.

HinesWard86
01-31-2009, 10:08 PM
hmmm, I'm not sure, you may be right. apologies if I was in error.

You were right, down to +120 though.

Thanks for the heads up